Monday, August 4, 2014

Are you a Pre, Mid or Post Tribulationist?

                                       
The tribulation is a future seven year period of horrific events. It is the time where God unleashes His Holy wrath against an unholy world of evil doers. As a matter of fact Jesus said it will be the worst time in human history (Matt 24:21).  The last three and one half years in particular will be the worst of all. All one has to do is read Revelation chapters 6-18 which describes the Great Tribulation (the last three and a half years) in great detail.

Another important matter that is always the topic of discussion is where is the Church during this time in history? That is what I want to discuss.

Regarding the Church there are 3 popular views: 1) Pre-tribulational,  2) Mid-tribulational, 3) Post-tribulational.
            
             Which view is correct?

I’m admittedly a pre-tribulationalist. I believe the Church will be raptured, caught up to meet the Lord in the air before God unleashes His wrath on the earth. There are other well known people that hold to a pre-tribulational view such as: Thomas Ice, Ron Rhodes, John Walvoord, D Charles Stanley, John Macarthur, Norman Geisler, Chuck Missler, Chuck Smith, John Ankerberg and John Weldon, Charles Ryrie, Charlie Campbell of Calvary Chapel – Vista, and obviously Tim Lahaye, and Jerry Jenkins who authored the famous “Left Behind “ series which has sold millions.

There are several reasons why I hold to a pre-tribulational view.
1.      The Flood of Noah – Once Noah and his family with some of the animals were safely in the ark and God closed the door, the floods came and destroyed everything living thing outside of the ark. Only Noah and his family along with the animals survived (Gen 7).

2.      Lot and family escape the judgment of Sodom and Gomorrah – Once the angels forced Lot, his wife (disobeyed and was turned into salt), and his daughters out of the city, fire and brimstone rained on the city from heaven and destroyed everyone in it (Gen 19).

3.      God protects the Hebrew’s firstborn when the Lord’s strikes dead all the first born of Egypt – The 10th and final plague on the land of Egypt brought great sorrow upon the Egyptians. The first born of the Hebrews was not harmed (Ex 12:29-32).


4.      The protection of Rahab and her family when God destroys Jericho – (Joshua 6).
The point I’m making is that in each instance, God protected His people from calamity; either by protecting them through the judgment, or removing them from it altogether.
I believe the Lord will do the same thing when the Rapture takes place; He will snatch his Church out of the earth before He unleashes his wrath on the earth for it’s wickedness.

                                 The word Rapture does not appear in the Bible
This is indeed true. The word Rapture is not in the Bible. In I Thessalonians 4:17 we read of believers being caught up to meet the Lord in the air; to be forever with the Lord. The word caught or catch is the Greek word harpazo. This word means to seize, snatch by force. The latin word is Rapturo where we get the English word Rapture.

The first instance where a rapture occurs is when God takes Enoch alive into heaven (Genesis 5:24). God also raptured the prophet Elijah in 2 Kings 2:11b. The Lord Jesus Christ was raptured into heaven in Acts 1:9. The two witnesses were caught up to heaven In Revelation 11:12. The apostle Paul was caught up to heaven to receive un-repeatable revelation in 2 Corinthians 12:2.

The apostle John was caught up in the Spirit and saw multiple heavenly visions that he was to record in Revelation 4:1-2.

The point I’m making is just because the exact word does not appear in the Bible does not deny the reality of the event in the Bible.
                                 
                                           What about the Mid-tribulational view?

There are those that subscribe to a mid-tribulational view in regards to the rapture. Meaning they believe the rapture will occur in the middle of the seven year tribulation; at the point where we reach what Jesus called “Great Tribulation” (Matt 24:21). This is the point where the man of sin is revealed (The beast of Revelation), 2 Thessalonians 2:4.

I respectfully disagree with this conclusion for the four reasons I mentioned above, and along what Revelation 3:10 where Jesus through John addresses the Church in Philadelphia, “Because you have kept the word of my patience, I will keep you from the hour of trial that is coming on the whole world to try those who dwell on the earth”.

The Lord is I believe is not only preserving us through it, but delivering us out of it before it occurs. Keep in mind, the rapture is a sign-less event; meaning there are no precursory signs that have to take place before it occurs. It can happen at anytime. Even today!

Another reason I believe in a pre-tribulational rapture is in John 14:2-3. This is where Jesus says He is leaving to prepare a place for us in His Father’s house. Obviously since He is doing this, He will take us to Heaven where He is one day. This to me is why I believe the Lord has to be referring to the rapture of the Church.

 Won’t there be people that are saved during the Tribulation? If so, how you can say believers are raptured to heaven before  the Tribulation occurs?
Those that are saved during the tribulation are who we call tribulation saints. The Church I believe has been taken to heaven by the Lord prior to the seven year Tribulation period. The Bible tells us in Revelation 14:6 that an angel will preach the eternal gospel to those on the earth. This will bring about the salvation of many people along with those saints who preach the gospel to others resulting in more souls being saved. Many of these tribulational Saints will die for their gospel witness while on earth and will seek vengeance on their own blood (Rev 6:9-11; 20:4). Others no doubt will survive the great tribulation and will become along with those  saints that are killed I believe the sheep described by Jesus in Matthew 25:34-41. The saints that die during the tribulation, and those that survive will both reign with Christ one thousand years.  This will include all saints from the Old and New Testaments that come back with the Lord at the Battle of Armageddon (Rev 19).[1]
Isn’t the Rapture and the Day of The Lord one and the same event?
Those that hold to the view that the rapture (the catching away of the Church), and the return of Christ are the same event support a post-tribulational view of the rapture.

Supporters of this position say that if one believes in a rapture where Jesus takes saints to heaven before the tribulation are indeed advocating two returns of Jesus Christ. The first return would be the rapture of the Church where the saints of God meet Him in the air ( Thess 4:16-18). The second return would be at the end of tribulation at the battle of Armageddon (Rev 19).

Those that support a pre-tribulational position do not see the rapture as the second coming of Christ. Reason being is that at that time He is not coming in judgment, He is simply returning to gather His Church/Bride and take them to the place that He has prepared for them (John 14:2-3).

What the post-tribulationist believe is that when the Christ returns for judgment, He will at that time resurrect saints who have already died in Him, and transform living saints, making them immortal (I Cor 15:51-58; I Thess 4:13-18). All of these will meet Him in the air only to come immediately back down with Him so that He can destroy the armies of the earth brought together by the Beast and False Prophet (Rev 19:19-21).
Here are some problems I have with the post-tribulational view:
1.      
If the saints are only going to meet the Lord in the air and not taken into heaven, what was the point in Jesus preparing a place for us in His Father’s house If He never was going to take us there (John 14:2-3)?

2.      Supporting a post-tribulational view means that all the Church will endure the horrors of the judgments of God. This view contradicts Revelation 3:10.

3.      There is no mention of the Church in chapters 6-18 of Revelation which implies that it was not on earth during the tribulation. The Church is not alluded to again until chapter 19 onward.

4.      With the rapture we will meet the Lord in the air. With the day of the Lord, Jesus is coming back to earth to destroy His enemies and set up His eternal kingdom (Daniel 2:44).

5.      For saints to be resurrected and transformed to immortality, meet the Lord in the air only to come right back down to the earth is illogical. Though I can not be dogmatic, it doesn’t appear the Lord is going to do this.

6.      Post-tribulationists deny imminency, that Christ could come for His Church at any moment. Since they believe the rapture occurs at the second coming, the rapture for them contains all the precursory signs of the second coming described by Jesus in Matthew 24. There would be no need for a rapture at all; for the second coming swallows it up.


7.      Jude vs. 14 indicates the Lord will return with ten thousands of His saints to execute judgment on the earth. This would indicate that in order for the saints to come to earth with the Lord, the Lord had to have captured them prior to His return. This speaks of a pre-tribulational rapture. A similar passage is in Revelation 19:14.

8.      Paul mentions that the rapture of the Church as comforting news (I Thess 4:18). The second coming is anything but that. Listen to the Prophets of old in describing the day of the Lord (i.e. the second coming):

a.      Micah – For behold the day is coming, burning like and oven…Behold I will send you the Elijah the prophet before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord (Micah 4:1, 5)

b.      Zechariah – Behold, the day of the Lord is coming, and your spoil will be divided in your midst. For I will gather all the nations to battle against Jerusalem; the city shall be taken the houses rifled, and the women ravished (Zech 14:1-2a).

c.       Zephaniah – The great day of the Lord is near; it is near and hastens quickly. The noise of the day of the Lord is bitter. There the mighty men will cry out. That day is a day of wrath, a day of trouble and distress, a day of devastation and desolation, a day of darkness and gloominess, a day of clouds and thick darkness (Zeph 1:14-15).

d.      Obadiah – For the day of the Lord upon all nations is near (vs 15).

e.      Joel – And I show wonders in the heavens and in the earth; Blood and fire and pillars of smoke. The sun shall be turned into darkness, and the moon into blood before the coming of the great and awesome day of the Lord (Joel 2:30-31).

f.        Isaiah – Behold the day of the Lord comes, cruel with both wrath and fierce anger, to  lay the land desolate, and He will destroy its sinners  from it . I will punish the world for its evil, and the wicked for their iniquity (Isa 13:9, 11a).



9.      Post-tribulationists make no room for the Marriage Supper of the Lamb. Christ’s bride, the Church are clothed in clean bright linen before his return to earth in preparation for this blessed event. If the rapture occurs after the tribulation, and the Church is still on the earth, this holy matrimony does not occur. Christ does not claim His bride after the tribulation, but before. That is why they return from heaven to earth with Him (Rev 19:8).

10.  If the rapture occurs at the second coming what would be the point of the dead rising in Christ first in I Cor 15 and I Thess 4? The Lord might as well wait to raise the dead in Christ upon His return to earth since they are not going to heaven (in the Posttribs view).

11.  The scripture clearly teach that the rapture is a mystery unknown until Paul revealed it in I Cor 15:51. We shall be changed in the twinkling of an eye. The day of the Lord was prophesied in the OT (see #8). The rapture was not.

12.  The scripture tells us that God has not appointed us to wrath, and also that God has delivered us from the wrath to come (I Thess 1:10; 5:9). In Revelation 6:15-17 we read, And the kings of the earth, the great men, and the rich men, the commanders, the mighty men, every slave, and every free man hid themselves in the caves and in the rocks of the mountains, and said to the mountains and rocks, “Fall on us and hide us from the wrath of the Lamb! For the great day of His wrath has come, and who is able to stand?”

We see that the wrath of God is reserved for his enemies and not His saints. Although some tribulation saints will have to suffer and die during the tribulation, they will be resurrected to eternal life once the Millennium takes place.

It is clearly evident I believe the rapture and the day of the Lord are two distinct events. They are just too dissimilar.



What about the last trumpet in  I Corinthians 15:52 and the seventh trumpet in Revelation 11:15; aren’t they the same?

It is assumed by some (I would imagine mostly post-tribulationists) that these trumpets are the same, but they are not. At the last trumpet the Lord himself is commanding the righteous dead to wake up. There will be the resurrection of dead saints who will be raised immortal along with the living saints who will be changed at the rapture. These saints will meet the Lord in the air. The seventh trumpet in Revelation signifies the coming of the Lord to the earth to destroy His enemies. Notice in Revelation 11:19 it says there were lightnings, noises, thundering, an earthquake, and great hail. There is no such description in I Cor 15:51-52 or I Thess 4:16-18.

How can you pre-tribulationists say there is a resurrection of dead saints prior to the rapture when Revelation 20:4-6 refers to the first resurrection after the second coming?

In I Cor 15:51-52 and I Thess 4:16-17 discusses the resurrection of the saints, Old and New Testament. What is occurring is that the person’s spirit which is heaven will be joined with their physical bodies (2 Cor 5:8). They will be alive again immortal; never to die again. This is what Bible describes as our glorification. Our salvation has reached it’s final stage. Once the dead are raised and those who are alive and remain are caught up to meet the Lord in the air we are taken to heaven.

So, what is the first resurrection spoken of in Revelation 20:4-6? The first resurrection refers to those believers who are killed during the great tribulation (the last 3 ½ years). We refer to them as tribulation martyrs. These are the ones who refused to accept the mark of the beast (also known as the man of sin, Antichrist, and little horn) on their right hand or foreheads. They were faithful to the call of God The Bible tells us they will be resurrected to reign with Christ for one thousand years. This the first resurrection is called that because the second resurrection occurs after the one thousand years have been finished. The second resurrection is strictly for all the wicked who lived their lives in rebellion against the word of God. They will face the Great White Throne judgment, and be thrown alive into the Lake of Fire because their names were not written in the Book of Life (Rev 20:15).


So now one can see why the first resurrection is called that simply to differentiated it from the second one. The first resurrection in Revelation 20:4-6 has nothing to do with the resurrection that occurs during the rapture which happens before the tribulation, second coming and millennium. To say that the resurrection rapture (if one permits the expression) occurs after the second coming as posttribs believe would force these events out of sequence.[2]

Concluding, there is no doubt the Bible teaches the rapture of the Church. The big divide among pre and post tribulationists is regarding when it occurs. The aforementioned has to support a pretrib position. To the writer it is the only way the events during the end times harmonize.




[1] Those that reign with Christ for the 1000 years (Millennium) will encompass all saints for all time.


[2] If the first resurrection occurs at the same time as the rapture posttrib then what you have is the tribulation martyrs being raised to life before the dead in Christ in I Cor & I Thess. This view makes the rapture in essence null and void and immediately ushers in the Millennium; the saints never go to meet the Lord in the air to go the place Jesus prepared for us in His Father’s house (John 14:2-3). This view works against the Post-tribulationist position. For while they claim they do not deny the reality of a rapture, the way they view end time events actually removes it from eschatological events.

Saturday, July 26, 2014

Putting the "World" in context

The original Greek word for world is the word cosmos. In the gospel of John world is used several different ways. Let’s go over them.

1.      John 1:10 – He was in the world, and the world was made through Him, and the world did not know 
Him.
In this verse the word world is making reference to the physical planet earth we live in and the fact that Jesus in eternity past created the universe. Both Col 1:15 and Heb 1:2 tells us that Jesus created all things.

2.      John 1:29 – Behold the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world.               

In this passage John the Baptist is introducing to His disciples and others that Jesus is the Messiah that will take away sins. Automatically when we see the word world, we conclude that it is inclusive. The word world here has to refer only to the elect and/or chosen of God. Remember Matt 1:21 says Jesus will save his people (italics mine) from their sins            .          
Another passage that would apply here would be John 10:16; Jesus said, “And other sheep I have that are not of this fold; them also I must bring, and they will hear my voice, and there will be one flock and one shepherd”.

This passage describes that Jesus was sent not only to save his own countrymen the Jews, the Father sent Him to save Gentiles also. These are the other sheep. So the world here in this context is making reference to the whole world of the elect.

3.      John 13:1 – Now before the Feast of the Passover, when Jesus knew that His hour had come that He should depart from the world to the Father, having loved His own who were in the world, He loved them until the end.
The word world here is simply dealing with ascending out of the planet earth.



4.      John 12:31 – Now is the judgment of this world; now the ruler of this world will be cast out.
This verse deals with world as in this evil world system, and the ruler of it, the devil.
Ephesians 2:1 said that prior to our conversion we walked according to the course or ways of this world. This makes reference to the world’s ungodly system of evil.

5.      John 7:7 – Jesus speaking to His brothers said, “The world can not hate you, but it hates Me because I testify of it that it deeds are evil.
Here the word world in this passage is referencing the non-elect; those who are not saved.

6.      John 12:19 – The Pharisees therefore said among themselves, you see that you are accomplishing nothing. Look, the world has gone after Him!
This event is in reference to the beginning of Passion Week, on Palm Sunday on the 9th of Nisan (Mar/Apr) when our Lord rides on a donkey presenting Himself as the Messiah (Zech 9:9). The religious leaders said the world has gone after Him. The word world in this context is making reference to the region in which they lived, not the whole world.

7.      John 7:4b – Jesus is urged by His brothers to show Himself to the world

    Here the word world can make reference to the general public, not the entire world.

8.      John 3:16 – For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son. That whosoever believes in Him should not perish, but have eternal life.

The word world here means all of humanity. However eternal life is reserved for those that believe in what Jesus accomplished at the cross.

9.      John 3:17 -  For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved.

The word world here makes reference to the elect. You can also include I John 2:2 which states that Christ sacrifice for sins was for the whole world, not just the world of the Jew but God’s chosen from every tribe, nation, tongue and people. This passages reiterates one we discussed earlier (John 10:16).

There are those that will argue when that I John 2:2 makes reference to everyone in the world because the word whole appears before the word world, but it is not inclusive but exclusive. When Jesus died for the sins of the whole world, it was without distinction meaning that there was no preference between rich and poor, free and slave, male and female. All are one in Christ Jesus (Gal 3:28).

10.  John 17:9 – Jesus specifically says here that He is not praying for the world but those whom the Father gave to Him.

This is a clear indication that Jesus in His what is called His High Priestly prayer to the Father is praying for only the elect, the chosen of God and not the whole world (of the unsaved). Once again, meaning of the word world HAS to be defined by the context.

Concluding, as I have shown using this word world has to be defined contextually. We use the world generally all the time. For example, someone will say, “I have traveled the world”! That does not mean they have been to every county, village, city state on the planet. What they are saying is they have traveled the globe; they have gone to many different places in the world.

That is what is being described in the verses above. This word world is always a matter of contention when describing Jesus sacrificial death on the cross – was it for everyone who will ever live (indiscriminate), or was it simply for the world of the elect (discriminate)?
The latter is what the Bible teaches.




Sunday, July 13, 2014

ECCLESIOLOGY - The doctrine of the Church



We are converted as individuals, but function as a body – The Church. We must love God (vertical) and love our brothers/sisters (horizontal).

OT word that described the congregation Israel is the Hebrew word  (qahal).

Two Greek words that describe the Church are ekklesia (church or congregation), and synagog (as in Jewish synagogue or assembly).

The word used for the Universal Church is: katholikos; means general or universal. This is where we get the English word Catholic.
Jesus referred to His Church as a body, a household, and a temple.

The Church in relation to Israel – the church and Israel are distinct. But there are four possible views on this relationship:
1.       Unification view – argues the church and Israel are essentially identical
2.       Suppression view – argues the church is not Israel but has replaced or superceded it
3.       Distinction view – holds the view Israel and the church are two separate entities
4.       Revisionist or parallel covenants view – states that Israel and the Church have received two side by side covenants by which to relate to God

Believing Jews and Gentile are no longer two people but one in Christ (Gal 3:28). All believers comprise the Body of Christ.

Water baptism was similar to the rite of circumcision in the OT. Males that were circumcised physically signified they were part of the Israelite covenant community. In like manner, those professing to be genuine believers should be water baptized identifying with the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ.

9.3.4 The purpose of the churches:
1.       Mutual edification
2.       Carrying the gospel
3.       Purpose of worshipping God


Marks of pure and holy yet imperfect Church – certain elements must be present and consistent in a healthy church:
a.       Absolutely strong biblical teaching
b.      Those who professed Christ and exercise the faith by good works signifying their faith is real as James 2 declares
c.       Love for all the Saints (Eph 1; I John 2: 9-10; 3:10-20; 4: 7-5:1)
d.      Obedience to God commands. This is the only  way we can prove we love God
e.      Exercise of church discipline for sinning church members so as to maintain its purity (I Cor 5)
f.        Refutation of false doctrine and teachers

Ordinances in the Church – the two ordinances in the church that have stirred no small amount of controversy in church history are Baptism and the Lord’s Supper (Communion, Mass if you’re Catholic).
Some in the post apostolic church believed that regeneration could be achieved with water baptism and genuine saving faith would be exhibited by keeping these sacraments (greek word sacramentum). It was a faith plus works salvation.

Tertullian said, “Without these sacraments salvation is attainable by none.” That is how sacred many held these ordinances; to the point that they believed salvation could never be obtained.

The Roman Catholic Church took sacramentalism to another level. They instituted the following sacraments had to be observed in order to receive grace. They are:
a
.       Baptism
b.      Confirmation
c.       Penance
d.      Eucharist
e.      Holy orders
f.        Matrimony
g.       Extreme function
Since the Roman Church controlled these ordinances, they were the ones that ultimately determined a member’s salvation.

 Jesus is the agent of baptism using the element of baptism which is His Holy Spirit. Jesus in essence baptizes us unto himself by the Spirit of God. This is what the water immersion ceremony signifies. The water is a symbol of the Spirit in baptism.




                                                  John’s baptism versus Messianic baptism
                                     John’s
                              Messiah’s
*      With water
*      With Spirit
*      Preparation for judgment
*      Arrival of judgment
*      For repentance

*      By a less powerful servant of God
*      By the perfect servant of God



                .

Pneumatology – The doctrine of the Holy Spirit


3 Key definitions:

1. Spirit baptism is the act of Christ whereby He unites the NT believer with himself and with every other believer through the indwelling Spirit.

2. A Spiritual gift is an extraordinary, recognizable, Spirit-given ability for service in the church

3. A local church is an assembly of baptized professing believers in Christ, organized to accomplish God’s will.
Pneumatology – the area of systematic theology that is concerned with the person and work of the Holy Spirit.

 The Holy Spirit can be placed in theology proper as well as pneumatology because the subjects of main theology and the doctrine of the Spirit are interwoven

 Hebrew term for Spirit is ruah usually translated Spirit. Ruah can also mean wind or breath

 Greek term for Spirit is pneuma. In the gospel of John the Spirit of God is also called the parakletos. In this sense the Spirit is our legal advocate. He is also a comforter

 The Spirit is also called the Spirit of Truth which relates to His teaching ministry (John 14:17; 15:26; 16:13; I John 4:6)

The Spirit is God – We know that the Holy Spirit is God because of:
 His omnipresence – He is everywhere at once
 His omniscience – He knows everything
 His omnipotence – He has all power
 Source of life

We know the Spirit is God because of His activity in:
 Creation (Ps 104:30; Job 33:4)
 Predicting the future (Acts 21:11; 2 Peter 1:21)
 Resurrection (Rom 8:11)
 Regeneration (John 3:5, 8; Titus 3:5)
 Inspiration of the prophets and scripture (Matt 22:43; 2 Pet 1:21)
 Virginal conception (Luke 1:35)

 Intercession (Rom 8:26)
 Sanctification (I Thess 2:13)
The Holy Spirit is a personal being. He possesses:
 Intellect (Rom 8:27)
 Emotion (Eph 4:30; Isa 63:10)
 Volition (Acts 13:2; 1 Cor 12:11)

The Holy Spirit does things that only persons can do. He teaches (Neh 9:20; John 16:13; 1 Cor 2:13).
The Holy Spirit is also a revelator (I Cor 2:10; I Tim 4:1; Heb 3:7). He searches (I Cor 2:10), and He intercedes (Rom 8:26). All these things speak of personhood.

The Spirit can be obeyed (Acts 10:19-21; 13:2). He can be lied to (Acts 5:3). As a matter of fact in this verse Peter tells Ananias and Sapphira that they have lied to God. This proves without any shadow of doubt that the Holy Spirit is God.

The Holy Spirit was involved in creating the heavens and earth (Genesis 1:2).

The Holy Spirit is the person that empowered the writers to communicate God’s message to His people and to the known nations at that time.

The Holy Spirit is the one that revealed divine truth to the OT & NT writers of God’s word. Without the Spirit’s supernatural insight, God’s true word would have never been revealed to mankind. The prophets, psalmists and judges could not declare God’s truth unless the Spirit spoke to them as He (the Spirit) was their sole source of divine revelation.

 Revelation by prophecy was the most common form of revelation
The Holy Spirit is the one that Inspired the Scriptures – What this means is the Spirit breathed God’s words in His servant’s mouth. Plenty of times in the OT we read a passage that says,” the word of the Lord came to me saying…” (Isa 6:8, et al). When this phrase was uttered, the man of God spoke the oracles of the Lord ( 2 Peter 1:21).

The Holy Spirit authenticates – The way the Spirit proves his word is true is by verifiable signs and wonders through his servants the prophets and apostles of the OT & NT. The miracles performed by these individuals gave validity to the words spoken to whom these men spoke to. Jesus himself said to the populace of his day, “Unless you see signs and wonders you will not believe” (John 4:48). People have to see something before they believe a newly revealed message from God never heard before.
The only way divine revelation will have its desired effect on sinful man is if the Spirit decides to penetrate a person’s heart with the truth.
3
The Holy Spirit is the one that convicts – Jesus declared this would be one of the functions or duties of the Spirit when he ascended to His Father (John 16:8-11). What Jesus did on earth in convicting the world of sin, righteousness and judgment, the Spirit will continue to pickup where Jesus left off for remember, Jesus said the Holy Spirit was another comforter (John 14:16).

The Holy Spirit is a persuader – Without the Spirit we can never understand divine truth. Without comprehension no one will ever be granted repentance and faith to believe the gospel and receive salvation. I would also align this with the illumination of the Spirit of God. The primary text used is (I Cor 2:14).

The Holy Spirit is the one that provides assurance for the believer – I believe the only way we can know for sure if the Spirit is in us is how we behave outwardly. The activities we are engaged in consistently reveal the spirit that is controlling us. Do we love God’s law and desire to obey and do it faithfully? This proves we love God (John 14:15). Do we love the people of God as John consistently commands us in his first epistle? We have to or else we are murderers and no murderer has eternal life abiding in him if we say we hate our brother (I John 3:15).

By review the four ways the Spirit provides revelation:
a. Reception
b. Conviction
c. Persuasion
d. Assurance

The Holy Spirit was very active in the OT lives of His people enabling them for service. Here are a few:
a. Moses and his elders (Num 11:7)
b. Joshua (Deut 34:9)
c. Othniel (Judg 3:10)
d. Gideon (Judg 6:34)
e. Jephthah (Judg 11:29)
f. Samson (Judg 13:25)
g. David (I Chron 28:11-12)

8.4.1.3 The Holy Spirit will be the one that will enable the children of Israel to keep God’s New or everlasting covenant . Ezekiel says this, “I will put my Spirit (italics mine) within you and cause you to walk in my statues and be careful to obey my rules (Ezekiel 36:27, ESV). Jeremiah 31:31-34 says God will make a new covenant with Israel.
4
How the Spirit operated in the life of Jesus:
a. His virgin birth
b. Announced him as the Messiah predicted by the OT prophets
c. The Spirit was Jesus guide in the earth
d. Empowered Him to perform miracles (Matt 12:28)
e. Jesus gave this same Holy Spirit to believers on the day of Pentecost (Acts 2)

The Interadvent era – This is the current era we are living in right now – between the two advents of Christ. The time the church is now has been called several things: kingdom of God, kingdom of heaven, eternal life.
Life in the Spirit – allows us to enjoy eternal life now although our complete salvation will not be realized until Christ second advent ( I John 3:2).

5 characteristics of life In the Spirit:
a. This life comes through Christ
b. The Spirit places the believer in the body of Christ
c. The Spirit inside of us is the down payment that what He began in us He will finish
d. Gives us the ability or power to obey God
e. Spirit has made us a new man in Christ

8.4.4 The Spirit will be active in the future – in the future the Spirit will be at work during the seven year tribulation period in saving souls. Israel will be grafted back into their own olive tree meaning those elected will in God’s time will believe the gospel message and be saved (Romans 11:25-27). Also the Spirit will be present after the tribulation into the millennial reign of Christ.

8.5 The Holy Spirit and baptism – The only baptism that saves is baptism of the Holy Spirit. Holy Spirit baptism is the new birth. This is independent of water baptism. Water baptism is important in that we demonstrate outwardly what has already taken place on the inside. Some churches belittle water baptism because it does not save but it should be performed by every believer. Some over emphasize it’s importance to the degree that they believe the ritual is salvific.

Spirit and water immersion are the invisible and visible sides of the same act.
Christ is the baptismal agent – Christ is the one who sent the Spirit to baptize believers in the body of Christ. In other words Christ is the baptizer using the Holy Spirit as the baptizing element as John the Baptist said (John 1:33b).

The baptismal recipients are all believers in Christ ( I Cor 12:13)
Many Christians in the early church believed that Spirit baptism had to include the water ritual in order for someone to be saved. This practice came to be known as sacredotalism; meaning baptism was
5
strictly based on the one administering the rite rather one being baptized according to God’s word. Once again, water baptism is the outward sign of the rebirth, not the rebirth itself.

In response to a “second baptismal work” of the Holy Spirit – both Pentecostals and Charismatics insist there is a subsequent spirit baptism with the evidence of speaking in tongues according to Acts 2. For them, this is a normative in that they believe all believers are supposed to experience this “second endowment” of the Holy Spirit’s power.

When the believers spoke in tongues in Acts 2, 10 & 19, this was NOT a second baptism. Rather the accompaniment of the utterance of speaking in these different dialects.

8.6 The Holy Spirit in sanctification – the Spirit is the agent that causes the believer to live holy and continue to progress in holiness. It is essential that we conform into the image of Jesus Christ.
The Hebrew word of sanctify is from the root qdsh. Another word for sanctify is hieros.
8.6.2 Sanctification in the New Testament – the believer’s sanctification comes to us in 3 parts:
a. Definite Sanctification – that process where God removes one from the world and brings him in the body of Christ. This is equivalent to salvation. This is a one time act.

b. Progressive Sanctification – the process where God by the Spirit is conforming the convert more and more into Christ likeness. Sin should be diminishing in the believer’s life as he is continually washed by the water of God’s word. John the Baptist said regarding himself, “He (Christ) must increase I must decrease (John 3:30).

c. Final Sanctification – this is when our salvation is complete. The presence of sin is forever removed from our lives. We have reached glorification. We are perfect, like our Savior Jesus.
It was not until the Reformers did the concept of sanctification make sense to the Church. The early church did not understand that sanctification was distinct from justification.

8.6.3.1 The ancient and medieval church eras – the ancient church did not do a good job of distinguishing justification and sanctification. The differences are this, justification is the point of belief where God imputes his righteousness to the believer. In other words, the sinner has received a “not guilty” legal verdict because of his sins being fully paid for by Jesus Christ on the cross. Sanctification is once again that ongoing process whereby the Holy Spirit is making the believer holy. Sanctification happened post confession. The error of the medieval church is that justification and sanctifying grace was administered through the sacraments, mainly baptism and communion. These practices were so
6
important in the church at that time that it was believed that one could earn more grace and become free from sin.

When the Reformation era arrived, they put justification and sanctification back into their proper places. Contrasting the Catholics, the Reformers said we can not live in a sinless life. Sanctification flows from justification but they are not one and the same. Point blank, the Catholics view of salvation is by works which clearly violates scripture. The Protestants teach what the Bible has always taught salvation is by grace alone, through faith alone, by Christ alone. We cannot be saved by works of sacredotalism (i.e. keeping the sacraments-baptism, communion).

8.6.3.3 Arminianism – opposed Calvinsim of the 17th century. A group called the Remonstrants are those that followed Jacob Arminius’ doctrine which produced a document called the Remonstrance. Arminians believe that basically one could degenerate in the faith and fall from grace.

John Wesley who also was an Arminian believed that a second work of grace was bestowed whereby a believer could live a sinless life. He added a form of perfectionism in his Arminian theology.

Even beyond Wesley the Methodists in the 19th century US taught a second work of grace they called “entire sanctification” which they believed could be attained in this life. What this meant was that complete freedom from sin could be obtained in this life.
The Keswicks did believe in a second work of grace, but did not believe in complete freedom from sin. They did believe that known sin could be defeated. For the Keswicks this was normal and expected.

Means of sanctification:
a. The word of God (John 17:17)
b. Perseverance through trials (Rom 5:3-5; James 1:2-4)
c. Ministry of other believers (Heb 10:24-25)
d. The exercise of spiritual gifts (I Cor 14:12; Eph 4:11-16)
e. Hope of our Lord’s return (Heb 10:25; I John 3:3; 2 Pet 3:11-14)
f. Divine discipline (Heb 12: 10-11)
Sanctification is an imperative for the believer. We cannot get to heaven without holiness (Heb 12:14).

8.7 Spiritual Gifts – all of these enablements are for the edifying of the Body of Christ. The one gifted was never supposed to use his/her gift for themselves but for the benefit of all believers. The Holy Spirit is the one that distributes all the gifts as He sees fit. We are not to pray for these gifts. In a sense, the gift chooses you, you do not choose the gift.
1 The professor doesn’t mention it in his notes but Arminians believe one can fall from grace
To the extent that salvation can be lost
7
The OT prophecy of Joel 2:28-29 was partially fulfilled on the Day of Pentecost recorded in Acts 2. This prophecy was strictly speaking about the Spirit coming upon all flesh but Pentecost was pre-cursor to what will be fulfilled before the Millennium reign of Jesus; the second/return of Jesus Christ.

Spiritual gifts must be distinguished from the Fruit of the Spirit which makes reference to a believer’s pursuit of godly character and behavior.

Gifts that were definitely temporary were tongues, prophecy and knowledge (I Cor 13:8-12) along with the apostle and the prophet. The apostle and prophet were foundational gifts in God’s house and a second foundation can no man lay down.


A man named Michael Harper a Pentecostal wrote that “ the gifts did cease from the pages of church history.”


The original twelve apostles would be the eleven including Paul (eliminating Judas Iscariot). These are the ones the Jesus Christ himself commissioned to carry on His work on earth. They were supernaturally endowed by the Holy Spirit to perform miraculous signs, wonders, healing and mighty deeds just as Christ did. This let the populace know that their message contained the same authority Christ did (2 Cor 12:12; Heb 2:3-4). Two other determinants that made an apostle was that they were commissioned by the Lord Jesus Himself (Matt 10:1-10; Rom 1:1-5), and they were eye witnesses to His resurrection.

8.7.6 The Gift of Tongues and Interpretation of Tongues - these gifts were a supernatural manifestation of the Holy Spirit power where some could speak in a known human language they never learned. The supernatural gift of interpretation was the ability to translate that language either by the speaker themselves or someone in the assembly with the gift of interpretation. These were temporary sign gifts given to the early church to prove that God was truly in their midst (I Cor 14:25). The combination of Tongues and Interpretation was equal to Prophecy which was superior to these gifts. Prophecy edified, exhorted, and comforted the whole church (I Cor 14:3, 5, 26). We are all supposed to build up the body for that is the reason why the Spirit bestowed the gifts in the first place.

Contrary to popular belief, not all believers spoke in tongues in the early church (I Cor 12:30) and what we are hearing as tongues today IS NOT the actual gift. What we are hearing today is ecstatic utterances, unintelligible speech, and gibberish. It is not from the Holy Spirit.

Another point to make regarding the genuine gift of tongues was that it was a judicial sign to unbelieving Israel which goes all the way back to Isaiah 28:12. It was also a sign to unbelievers ( I Cor 14:22). In what way? If someone is speaking in a tongue and the unbeliever is in your assembly they will not understand what is being said, will say those people are out of their minds and walk away. They will not hear the gospel in a language they understand and leave the church condemned because there was no interpreter.

The Gift of Healing – was only exhibited by Jesus, the Apostles, and their close associates in the NT (Stephen, Phillip Acts 6:8; 8:6). There may have been others in the early church, but the accounts are not recorded in scripture. This gift was never designed for every believer to posses. When Jesus and the apostles healed someone, it was either by a touch or a word (Matt 8:5-13; Acts 28: 7-9). When they performed a miraculous healing it was complete, evident, instantaneous and verifiable. Sometimes the benefactor did not have to exercise any faith to be healed like in the case with the paralytic at the pool of Bethesda (John 5:8).

Today faith healers are claiming to have the same gift of those in the early church did but they do not. When a healing does not occur in one of their crusades, they conclude that the initiate did not have enough faith or that they had sin in their life that prevented the power of God to heal them. This is an excuse to masquerade their impotency as a genuine healer. The blame is tragically placed at the feet of the infirmed not the charlatan. Every last person that Jesus and the apostles healed had sin in their lives, but it did not prevent them from receiving a blessing from God.

I also know that these modern day “fake healers” do not have the gift of healing for if they did, they could go into the hospitals, infirmaries, even the grave sites and heal everyone instantly. This supernatural power does not reside in the church today. The reason for its existence was to authenticate the messenger and the revelation they espoused as truly being from God.

While I believe the gift of healing is no longer operating, we are to pray for the sick by calling the elders of the church to pray the prayer of faith if we need it according to James 5:14.

Was Jesus ever capable of sinning?

When this question is asked, we are dealing with two ideas, peccability (the ability to sin), and impeccability (the inability to sin). This is a question that needs to be thought about and answered logically.

The Bible makes it clear that Jesus is God in the flesh (Isa 9:6; John 1:1; 8:58; 14:9; Titus 2:3; Heb 1:8-9). So as a result of being God, He is incapable of sinning. As God Jesus is perfect. Sin is against the nature of God. Think about it, if Jesus could sin, He would have been disqualified as a sacrifice for mankind’s sins. And if He could sin, He would not be God.

Opponents of this view would declare “how then could the temptations of Jesus be real if He was incapable of sinning?" We can look at our own lives to answer that question. There are a multitude of things we are tempted with that we do not give into. Drunkenness, fornication, adultery, getting high, stealing, cursing, lying, et al.  Just because Jesus never sinned does not mean the temptations to sin were not real. The temptations Jesus went through at the hands of the devil were very real, not illusions (Matt 4:1-11; Mark 1:13; Luke 4:1-13). That is why the Bible says we do not have a High Priest who cannot sympathize with our weaknesses, but one who has been tempted in all things as we are yet without sin (Heb 4:15). As a human being Jesus knows very well what temptation feels like.

Jesus questioned the Herodians and the Pharisees when they asked Him about paying taxes to Caesar by saying, “Why are you tempting me you hypocrites!” (Matt 22:18b). This account proves that Jesus was actually tempted to break the law of the land so that they could label him an enemy of the Roman crown.

What this means that Jesus was tempted in all points, not that He experienced every conceivable temptation under heaven (i.e. with a woman, stealing, lying, murder, etc.), but in all areas which are: the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, the pride of life (I John 2:16). Jesus as a perfect sinless human being can relate to our weaknesses which demonstrates His eternal love for us. He experienced what we experience everyday of our lives. By Christ going through the trials of life we go through makes his willful death on the cross for our sins that much more loving and sweeter to my soul.

                                     

                            Jesus nature also prevented Him from sinning

Remember Jesus was born without a sin nature unlike us. Every temptation Jesus experienced came from without, never within. Jesus was never tempted by being drawn away by His own lust and enticed like we are because He has no lust (James 1:14).  The Apostle said this, “who committed no sin nor was deceit found in His mouth” (I Peter 2:22. Quoting Isa 53:9).

Jesus Himself declares His own innocence when talking to the religious leaders by saying, “Which of you convicts me of sin? If I speak the truth why don’t you believe Me?” (John 8:46).

So we see Jesus did not sin because He did not desire to sin nor was He capable of sinning. That is impeccability. We on the other hand often sin because we desire to sin by our corrupt nature and can’t stop sinning. That is peccability.  We have a sin nature and Jesus as deity and a perfect human being has a sin-less nature. The wonderful dichotomy of all of this is Jesus the sin-less became sin by imputation[i] so that He could save the sinful and impute His righteousness to their account (Gen 15:6; Rom 4:5; Gal 3:6). As I have stated in the past I will state again, Jesus has no sin of His own, but for our sakes took on sin. Flip side of the same coin, we have no righteousness of our own, but for our sakes He granted us His righteousness. We are not essentially righteous, and our Lord is not essentially sinful.  Both are imputed. Both the sin and righteousness are real; they were graciously exchanged for our benefit and for God’s glory.

God the Father would have never sent even a potentially sinful man or angel to come to the earth to redeem us.  Remember to sin is break God’s laws. Jesus could never do that.




[i] Imputation means to place something on someone’s account. Metaphorically of God the Father placing on Jesus our sins so that when we believed His righteousness could be placed in our account.

Monday, July 7, 2014

Do all roads lead to God?

This title question often coincides with the statement, “It doesn’t matter what you believe as long as you are sincere!”

That is a popular phrase these days but, is the statement true? Well, let’s analyze it for a moment.

When those two Jets deliberately flew into the two trade center buildings in New York City on September 11, 2001, the terrorist group AL-QAEDA headed by Osama Bin Laden were on a suicide mission. The terrorists that hijacked those planes were sincere in their belief that Allah would grant them entrance into heaven if they completed their jihad (holy war) mission against unbelievers (the U.S.).

To become a martyr in the name of Allah grants a Muslim entrance into heaven. That is why it is normal for young people in the religion to strap explosives to themselves and blow themselves and others up in the name of Allah.

Mind you, that is an extreme way to be sincere, but this practice is sincerely wrong. It does matter what we believe. Just because someone is convinced something is true, doesn’t mean that it is.
            
              Two plus two will always equal four no matter how convinced someone thinks it is not.

Regarding the cult of the Jehovah Witnesses. It was taught that in 1935 only 144,000 of their followers went to heaven. As a result, heaven is full and no other members can get in. The remaining witnesses that are worthy will be resurrected and spend eternity on a Paradise Earth.

Unbelievers do not go to hell in their worldview, they are annihilated.[1]

This belief contradicts scripture. In Revelation 7:9-10 The Apostle John sees a future glimpse of a multitude residing in heaven which no one could number. Ironically this same chapter deals with the sealing of 144,000 Hebrews (not modern day Jehovah’s Witnesses) who most scholars believe are evangelists. The enumerable multitude that follow are the harvest of these 144,000 gospel preaching to the world.[2]

Jehovah Witnesses also believe that Jesus is the physical manifestation of the archangel Michael. The Witnesses founder Charles Russell (who is never mentioned on their website far as I can tell: www.jw.org) “prophesied” Jesus would return spiritually not physically initially in 1874. Later the date was changed to 1914 (by Russell), 1925, 1941 and 1975 by others members.[3]
            
                   Charles Russell and the Witnesses lied.

Jehovah Witnesses also do not believe Jesus arose physically from the dead. The Bible makes it clear He did rise bodily from the grave.

Luke 24:36-39 says this, “Now as they said these things, Jesus Himself stood in the midst of them, and said to them, “Peace to you.” But they were terrified and frightened, and supposed they had seen a spirit. [The disciples initially made a similar error to that of the Jehovah’s Witnesses. The disciples “supposed” Jesus was a “spirit” or ghost. And Jesus corrected them.] And He said to them, “Why are you troubled? And why do doubts arise in your hearts? Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I Myself. Handle Me and see, for a spirit does not have flesh and bones as you see I have.”

In Revelation 1:7 we read, Behold, He is coming with clouds, and every eye will see Him, even they who pierced Him. And all the tribes of the earth will mourn because of Him. Even so, Amen.”  

These passages and so many others prove Jesus rose bodily from the grave. The bodily resurrection is affirmed even in their corrupt New World Translation (NWT – 2013 edition) of the Bible that Jesus arose bodily from the grave. You can read it for yourself online at www.jw.org.

Once again the Witnesses are very sincere regarding their doctrine, but unfortunately for them they are sincerely wrong. This road definitely does not lead to God.

The Mormons believe that Jesus and Lucifer were spirit brothers. Read this quote from their own writings:

“On first hearing, the doctrine that Lucifer and our Lord, Jesus Christ, are brothers may seem surprising to some—especially to those unacquainted with latter-day revelations. But both the scriptures and the prophets affirm that Jesus Christ and Lucifer are indeed offspring of our Heavenly Father and, therefore, spirit brothers... Jesus was Lucifer’s older brother. (See Col. 1:15; D&C 93:21[4].)” 

Mormons are Universalists; meaning as a result of Jesus death on the cross, all people will be saved, including Non-Mormons. There are 3 levels of heaven one can go to. They are:
·         
Celestial (the highest, for faithful Mormons)
·         Terrestrial (the middle, for "less than valiant Mormons" and morally upright non-Mormons)
·         Telestial (the lowest, for those who were carnal and sinful throughout life )

This view clearly violates scripture. The Bible clearly tells us that many will be eternally lost due to unbelief and rejecting the completed vicarious blood sacrifice of Jesus Christ on the cross for the forgiveness of sins. Everyone will not make it into heaven; neither are there three divisions in heaven.

Revelation 20:15 says, “If anyone’s name was not found written in the book of life, he was thrown into the lake of fire”.

With the Muslims, Jehovah Witnesses and Mormons and so many others religions, each one teaches a different gospel. Paul writing to the Galatians said this, “I am amazed that you are so quickly deserting Him who called you by the grace of Christ, for a different gospel; which is really not another; only there are some who are disturbing you and want to distort the gospel of Christ. But even if we, or an angel from heaven, should preach to you a gospel contrary to what we have preached to you he is to be Anathema! (Greek for accursed). As we have said before, so I say again now, if any man is preaching to you a gospel contrary to what you received he is to be accursed “(Gal 1:6-9)!

Paul wanted to make sure the Church at Galatia got the message clearly; the gospel he taught along with the other apostles and the faithful was the only true gospel. There are no others. Anyone teaching a perverted gospel message is to be eternally condemned. That is how serious God honors and is jealous for His holy truth! It is never to be distorted by any humans or angels.     
                    
                  
                  Never tamper with God’s word (Deut 4:2;Prov 30:6; Rev 22:18-19)!

Concluding, all roads or worldviews do lead to God in this sense; everyone will stand before God to give an account for the things they did on earth no matter the road or religion they embraced. Some to the resurrection of life for good deeds and others to the resurrection of judgment and damnation for evil deeds (John 5:28-29).

Preaching “another gospel” other than the true is most surely an evil deed. So we must also conclude that all roads lead to the God of the Bible in judgment, but only one road leads to eternal life (Luke 13:24; John 14:6).

Finally, while we as Christians can not accept false teachings from cults and other religions as alternative or additional revelation from God for that would be pluralism. The Christian faith is both exclusive and objective complete truth because of it’s founder, the Lord Jesus Christ. That does not mean we are not to love and respect those involved in false religions. We should listen to those of other faiths to see why they believe what they believe; praying and sharing the everlasting gospel with them whenever we get the opportunity. We need to be knowledgeable about our faith so we can point out the error in other belief systems. To do this is not arrogant or egocentric as some may say Christians are, it’s loving; the truth of the gospel is what sets men free and literally saves them from the gates of hell! As Jude says we are snatching them from the fire (Jude 23). We are to speak the truth in love (Ephesians 4:15). Perhaps God may grant some of them repentance so they can believe and be saved (2 Tim 2:24-25).

Do all roads lead to God? Yes and no. Yes because no matter what you believe we all will meet our Maker in judgment to give an account for our lives. No because it does matter what we believe. Once again all roads do not lead to salvation. Being sincere is only redemptive if we believe what is actually true; the whole counsel of biblical truth. Being sincere about what is wrong and dying for it is an eternal punishment one can never make right.

As someone poignantly said, “Eternity is a long time to be wrong!”
We must be most careful in who and what we believe in. Our eternal destiny depends on it.        




[1] This view is unbiblical. The unrighteous will spend eternity in the Lake of Fire. See Daniel 12:2; Matt 25:41-46;Luke 16:19-31; Rev 20:15.


[2]  There is no in my opinion rock solid proof that the 144,000 are evangelists because the text
Does not explicitly tell us. The implication is they are evangelists when you follow the narrative in
Revelation chapter 7. The multitude that follows seems to imply that they were preachers.


[3] The reason for the spiritual and not physical return is the Jehovah Witnesses deny the resurrection.
They say the body of Jesus dissolved into atoms or supernaturally was removed from the tomb. It’s believed that
Jesus spirit is alive perhaps to re-inhabit his angelic form Michael the archangel

[4] D&C stands for Doctrine and Covenants. One of the “holy” writings of the LDS.
To read and study more about other popular religions visit this site: www.alwaysbready.com

Revelation 20 - Part 1

This chapter is the only place where the devil is bound (vs 2). Notice an angel from heaven does it, not us. Humans have never been able to ...