Tuesday, July 26, 2016

Are we robbing God and cursed financially if we do not Tithe?

Will a man rob God? Yet you have robbed Me! But you say, In what way have we robbed You? In tithes and offerings. You are cursed with a curse, For you have robbed Me, even this whole nation. Bring all the tithes into the storehouse, that there may be food in My house, and try Me now in this says the Lord of hosts If I will not open the windows of heaven and pour out for you a blessing that there will not be room for you to receive it. And I will rebuke the devourer for your sakes, so that he will not destroy the fruit of your ground, Nor shall the vine fail to bear fruit for you in the field says the Lord 

-  Malachi 3:8-11

 Everyone in the church knows these verses, and many can quote them word for word. These are the premiere verses used to explain the tithe, and why many preachers and parishioners believe we are obligated to “pay” it.

I will submit to the reader that these verses have been grossly taken out of context – totally divorced of their original meaning, to mean something the prophet Malachi never intended. I was taught long ago that when a text is removed from its original context, you develop what is called a pretext. The meaning of pretext is: a reason given in justification of a course action that is not the real reason. The word pretext comes from two Latin words: Prae, which means before, and texere which means to weave. Combining the two you get pratexere which means to disguise.

So, when someone is using a pretext to drive a point across, or to get what they want, they disguise their actual intent. It's deception, a ruse or pretense. Unfortunately, plenty of preachers (especially televangelists)[i] create pretexts out of Holy scripture to get their point across to unsuspecting parishioners to siphon them out of their money in the “name” of Jesus.
The aforementioned passages are the ones they butcher the most.

Now, that I have written a small introduction, let's examine carefully Malachi 3:8-11.
The word tithe in the Hebrew is āśar.  The Greek word is dekatoō. Both words mean tenth or a tenth part. Most people believe when they see the word tithe(s), that simply means to give a tenth of their income to the church when they get paid. In other words, if you receive $500, you pay $50 in the collection plate. If you receive a $1000, you pay $100. Not to do so, is to rob God, and be subject to a curse. Many believe a financial curse. If they become ill, they believe is because they stopped tithing. If they lose their job, they believe is because they stopped tithing or never tithed. There are others that believe if they pay their tenth, they will receive a one-hundred-fold return on their giving. For example, you give $100, you will eventually receive $10,000 down the line; 100x100=10,000. This is also what is known as name-it-and-claim-it, or the prosperity gospel.
Sounds more like the lottery to me.

Disciples of this new age type of philosophy believe through positive confession which they believe is biblical faith can get God to do what they want; like for instance make them wealthy. The means is through tithing their money in order to get more money. Here’s a shock for many of you; OT tithing was never money. I’ll explain that later in the article.

Some of the popular tithing phrases used in churches are: “You cannot afford not to tithe!” “Tithe your way out of debt!” “Have a need, plant a seed!”

I have even heard of churches that will pray a special prayer over those whose pay their tenth, and pray for the rest of their congregation separately (i.e. those who do not tithe). It’s a sort of back of the hand prayer for the have-nots; once again, those who do not tithe (according to their definition of it).
Next, God through the prophet says, “Bring all the tithes into the storehouse so that there will be food or meat in my house.”

What was the storehouse? Many believe it to be the local church where one worships. That is not true. The storehouse was the place in the temple of God where goods were stored like fruit, grain, herbs, etc.

In Nehemiah 10:37-39 we read, “To bring the first fruits of our dough, our offerings, the fruit of all kinds of trees, the new wine and oil, to the priests, to the storerooms of the house of our God; and to bring the tithes of our land to the Levites, for the Levites should receive the tithes in all our farming communities. And the priest, the descendant of Aaron, shall be with the Levites when the Levites receive tithes; and the Levites shall bring up a tenth of the tithes to the house of our God to the rooms of the storehouse. For the children of Israel and the children of Levi shall bring the offering of the grain, of the new wine and the oil to the storerooms where the articles of the sanctuary are, where the priests who minister and the gatekeepers and the singers are; and we will not neglect the house of our God.”

It should be clear to all that the tithes belong to the Levites. The procedure was this, The 11 tribes of Israel were to gather the first fruits of their increase to the priests along with the tithes of what they produced from the ground to the storehouse. The Levites then were to give a tenth of the tithes (or a heave offering) they received from the people to the descendants of Aaron. The descendants of Aaron were priests.

This was not happening during the time of Malachi. That is why he commanded them to bring the tithes and offerings into the house of God so that there would be food in my house. Not to bring the first fruits and tithes was to deprive the Levites and the priests their income on which to live on. This was, in essence, robbing God. The tithe was taxation to their theocratic government.

The windows of heaven is where God stored the rain. Once Israel supplied God’s house with what He demanded, God would cause the rain to come down and give life to their ground and yield its produce blessings. The devourer is not the devil as I was taught years go; the devourer in this context were locusts who would eat everything in their paths. The Lord said He would rebuke these pests so that the harvests would come in their seasons.

The first mention of the tithe in Mosaic Law appears in Leviticus 27:30-33, “And all the tithe of the land, whether of the seed of the land or the fruit of the tree, is the Lord’s. It is holy to the Lord. If a man wants to redeem any of his tithes, he shall add one-fifth to it. And concerning the tithe of the herd or the flock, of whatever passes under the rod, the tenth one shall be holy to the Lord. He shall not inquire whether it is good or bad, nor shall he exchange it; and if he exchanges it at all, then both it and the one exchanged for it shall be holy; it shall not be redeemed.”

Notice all the tithes mentioned are seed, fruit, and herds. The tithe was never money! Shocked? It’s true. We just read it here. The children of Israel, not the church were to tithe the seed of the land, and the fruit of the trees and every tenth animal to God for it is holy. In addition, if anyone desired to buy back his tithe, he was required to pay an additional twenty percent redemption tax. The animals were not redeemable; you were not allowed to buy them back. This was the Levite’s tithe.

Israel paid three different tithes, not just one

In Deuteronomy 14:22-29 we read, “You shall surely tithe all the increase of your grain that the field produces year by year. And you shall eat before the Lord your God in the place where He chooses to make His name abide, the tithe of your grain and your new wine and your oil; of the firstborn of your herds and your flocks, that you learn to fear the Lord your God always. But if the journey is too long for you, so that you are not able to carry the tithe, or if the place where the Lord God chooses to put His name is too far from you, when the Lord your God has blessed you, then you shall exchange it for money, take the money in your hand, and go to the place which the Lord your God chooses. And you shall spend that money for whatever your heart desires; for oxen or sheep, for wine or similar drink, for whatever your heart desires; you shall eat there before the Lord your God, and you shall rejoice, you and your household.

You shall not forsake the Levite who is within your gates, for he has no part nor inheritance with you.
At the end of every third year[1], you shall bring out the tithe of your produce of that year and store it up within your gates. And the Levite because he has no inheritance with you, and the stranger and the fatherless and the widow who are within your gates, may come and eat be satisfied, that the Lord your God may bless you in all the work of your hand which you do.

By way of review, Moses talks about three different tithes here. 1) The tithe for the Levites. 2) A tithe for the annual religious festivals. 3) Every third year a tithe for the Levite, the alien, fatherless and the widow; sometimes called the poor or welfare tithe.

So every year two tithes, for the Levites and religious festivals, twenty percent. Every third year three tithes, thirty percent. So on average Israel paid 23.3% per year in tithes-taxes.
Sounds very much like taxes in America, doesn’t it?

Two important matters to point out: 1) tithes were paid annually, not every week. 2) For those who claim to tithe according to the Bible are not tithing nearly enough. Remember not only were tithes obligatory, so were certain offerings that were required every day. (Read Leviticus 1-7) There is no way we can tithe according to the Bible. The Israelites were farmers, an agrarian community who grew their own produce, and raised their own flocks and herds. We do not have those resources in the church.

Four other important texts regarding supporting the Levites with tithes and offerings are: Numbers 18:8-32, Deuteronomy 26:1-15, 2 Chronicles chapter 31, and Nehemiah 13:10-13. Notice in Numbers 18:20 God told Aaron that he and his children had no inheritance among the people, that is the other tribes. The Lord said He was their inheritance. What that means is the Levites whole life was that of purely worship and service. They were the priestly tribe and therefore owned no land. They were not farmers so they had to be compensated for their work on the tabernacle of meeting. The gifts received from their brethren was what they had to live on and take care of their families. Working on the tabernacle and handling the day to day responsibilities of God’s house was their occupation, and how they earned their living.

What about tithing before the law?

There are only two accounts of tithing pre-law. Both appear in Genesis. Abraham in Genesis 14:20 gives a tithe to Melchizedek king of Salem after Melchizedek blesses him after Abraham and his allies win a war in the valley of the kings. Abraham does not give the king a tithe of his personal property, but a tithe from the spoils of war, a war-tithe (Heb 7:4). Tithing was obviously a custom where Abraham lived, Ur of the Chaldees. It’s been reported that tithes were often given to kings and to false deities whom the people of the fertile crescent area lived. The area back then was called Mesopotamia which means land between two rivers (Tigris and Euphrates). Today it is Iraq. There is no indication in scripture that Abraham (Abram back then) was required to give a tenth of the spoils to Melchizedek.

In Genesis 28:20-22 we read, then Jacob made a vow saying, “If God will be with me, and keep me in this way that I am going, and give me bread to eat and clothing to put on, so that I come back to my father’s house in peace, then the Lord shall be my God. And this stone which I have set a pillar shall be God’s house, and all that You give me I will surely give a tenth to you.”

We find out later in Jacob’s life that God blessed him abundantly with wives, children, flocks, and herds. It is not recorded that Jacob tithed, but it would be safe to assume he did. God answered his prayer, so Jacob I’m sure kept his vow. An important point to make is Jacob put a condition on his tithe; if the Lord met his needs, he would give back a portion to the Lord as an expression of thanksgiving and worship. Also, if Jacob actually tithed it would have taken him twenty years to do it. From the time Jacob left his father's house until the time he returned home from his uncle's was a period of twenty years (Gen 31:38).

Jesus mentions tithing in NT so that means we are required to do it right?
Jesus operated under the law. The new covenant was not in force until Jesus died. Scripture tells us this. Hebrews 9:16-17 says, “For where there is a testament, there must also of necessity be the death of the testator. For a testament is in force after men are dead, since it has no power at all while the testator lives. Testator in the Greek is diatithēmi. It means one who makes a testament or covenant. Jesus’ death culminated the Old Covenant and ushered in the New.

We assume the gospels are NT because that is the way our Bibles are constructed. The gospel records are accounts still dealing with the Mosaic law. The first book under the New Covenant is the book of Acts starting in chapter two, the birth of the church.

In Matthew 23 Jesus is rebuking the Pharisees for their hypocrisy. “Woe to you scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you pay tithe of mint, anise, cummin, and have neglected the weightier matters of the law; justice, mercy and faith. These you ought to have done, without leaving the others undone” (vs 23).

Jesus said to them you are tithing the smallest herbs and spices, but the matters that are most important you have failed to, and because of their lack of compassion for others they were hypocrites. According to James 2:10, they had violated the entire law although they tithed.

Know anyone that will brag about their tithing, but has a jacked up lifestyle? There are many in the church. As long as they pay their tithe, they assume their lives are okay. That is what I call the hypocrites-tithe or the deception-tithe.

We have one more tithe Jesus mentions. It’s the parable of the Pharisee and the tax collector.

Also He spoke this parable to some who trusted in themselves that they were righteous, and despised others: “Two men went up to the temple to pray, one a Pharisee and the other a tax collector. The Pharisee stood and prayed thus with himself, ‘God, I thank You that I am not like other men – extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even as this tax collector. I fast twice a week; I give tithes of all I possess.” And the tax collector standing afar off, would not so much as raise his eyes to heaven but beat his breast saying, “God be merciful to me a sinner!’ I tell you, this man went down to his house justified rather than the other; for everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted” (Luke 18:9-14).

Jesus taught this parable to present a reality. This was not a true story, but an illustration  his audience could relate to. The Pharisee was smug and arrogant because he tithed and fasted. He was a legalist who no doubt believed he was in the kingdom of God because of his “good works”. He was not humble. The tax collector on the other hand never mentions tithing because he was a thief; tax collectors always collected more taxes than they were supposed to which made them rich through extortion. He knew he was a sinner, and pleaded to God for mercy for his soul.  Jesus said the tax collector went home justified because of his humility and unworthiness to be in God’s presence. The Pharisee who was of the religious elite was not justified because of his self-exaltation. Point being, many believe their works, whether its tithing or anything else is acceptable to God alone. Rather God is looking for a contrite and broken spirit.

These are the only accounts where Jesus mentions tithing. Both are under the OT not the NT.

Are there commands for New Testament Giving?

Giving in the NT is about attitude and heart, and not obligation. Make no mistake, giving is commanded in the church, and we should be willing and eager to do it. It is a privilege, and a blessing to give for the work of the ministry. It’s the least we should do in light of what Jesus did when He gave His life for our wretched souls (Rom 8:32). Any church leadership that tries to put you into bondage about your giving, and commands you tithe, or get involved in $20, $50, $100 lines, you should challenge them to prove their position biblically. If they refuse to submit to prescribed NT giving, you should seriously consider leaving that church.

No one should be forced to give due to compulsion from church leadership.
2 Corinthians 9:6-8 says, “But this I say, he that sows sparingly will also reap sparingly, and he that sows bountifully shall reap bountifully. So let each one give as he purposes in his heart give, not grudgingly or out of necessity for God loves a cheerful or hilarious giver. And God is able to make all grace abound toward you, that you, always have all sufficiency in all things, may have an abundance for every good work.”

Our reaping is in direct proportion to our sowing. If one cannot give freely and cheerfully, keep your money

I Corinthians 16 said that on the first day of the week (Sunday), those that were supporting the poor saints in Jerusalem were laying aside their contributions. This is when most people attend their worship services and is a great time to give your free will offerings to the Lord. Once again, no percentage or prescribed amount is required. Everyone gives based on their own convictions and how the Lord has prospered them.

That is what grace giving is all about. Jesus said to His disciples, “Freely you have received, freely give”

(Matt 10:8). We need to follow that example. Paul said, “It is more blessed to give than to receive” (Acts 20:35).

Another reason we must give is to support our spiritual leaders. They have families they need to take care of as well. The scripture says, “Those that preach the gospel should live of the gospel” (I Cor 9:14).

Our leaders need the support of the flock God has entrusted them with. If they are providing your spiritual needs; meaning they are feeding you God’s word, we are in turn to support them with our material resources (I Cor 9:11). This is their livelihood, and they must be compensated for it. A word of caution here: If someone is not teaching God’s word properly, you should NOT support that Pastor or their ministry. You are misusing God’s resources for an unworthy cause. Let us be discerning and prayerful what ministries we support.

The church is under grace, not under the law. Therefore, the tithe does not apply to the church. I have attempted in this article to prove that Biblically. Once again, the tithe had a specific purpose; first to pay the Levites for their work and ministry, and to finance their government. Secondly, to provide for their annual religious festivals; a national party. And third, to take care of the strangers, the orphans, and the widows; those who had nothing. Notice the poor in their land did not pay tithes, they received them. Those among us who are poor are in no position to support the church financially, but can with their time and talent. Once again, law tithing was never money (i.e. coinage).

If someone desires to give (not pay) a tenth of their income every time they get paid, that is fine. It is not the OT tithe, but more of what I would call a freewill tithe. I heard a message recently where the pastor called it, “Tithing Under Grace”, or “Grace Tithing”. I agree with both descriptions.
Today, we can give whatever we want. If we give less than a tenth of our income, we are not robbing God because we’re under grace. If one gives more than a tenth, that is fine also. It is a matter of our minds and hearts that counts, not the amount.

And finally, if one is going to subject themselves to the law-tithe, you must obey all the other 600 or so commands in the law which no one can do. If you offend in one area of the law, then you are guilty of all of it (James 2:10). What good is it if one brags they tithe, but neglects to pay their phone bill or worse you cannot pay your rent because you been brow beaten about making sure you pay your tithe? What type of witness are you giving the world as a Christian if you do not even meet your contractual obligations to your creditors; All for the sake of the tithe?

Galatians 3:13 says, “Christ has redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us.”
It is unfortunate for so many to believe that many in the church are under a curse due to not law-tithing when we have been made free in Christ. The tithe was taxation. We do not pay taxes to the church.

Therefore, if the Son has made you free, you shall be freed indeed (John 8:36).

There is therefore now (italics mine) no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus, who do not walk according to the flesh, but according to the Spirit. For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has made me free (emphasis added) from the law of sin and death (Rom 8:1-2).






[1] Every third year was called the Year of tithing (see Deuteronomy chapter 26).




[i] I will give a few preachers the benefit of the doubt that they are preaching the law-tithe with good intention; not because they are greedy. They believe this is God’s ultimate plan for giving. Their ignorance of the scriptures in this matter is still astounding because as a minister of the word you are required to study to show yourself approved (2 Tim 2:15). There are others that are manipulative, and will go through any gyration to loosen someone’s pockets and separate them from their money: prayer cloths, “healing waters” from the Jordan River, anointing oil, touch the screen for a healing when you send a faith-seed-offering, and the list goes on. Let’s pray for our leaders; that they exercise discernment in teaching correct giving. We also need to expose the charlatans and false teachers that prey on the flock. How someone handles a parishioner's hard earned money often times determines if one will continue to attend any church or never return again.

Sunday, July 24, 2016

Is there unrighteousness with God?

The reason why I ask the question is because for many God is not fair, they believe. Is this accusation true? Are there times in our lives where we feel we have been dealt a bad hand by God and He can longer be trusted? Perhaps we prayed to God for something and it did not come to pass, or He did not answer our prayer the way we expected Him to? Also, God takes way too long in answering our petitions. What is God’s problem – Is He even listening to us? If God is love, shouldn’t we get what we want from Him? Would it be safe to say some believe God is “obligated” to meet their need since they are good (in their own eyes of course)?

Yes, let us be honest. We have all felt that way. In fact, some of you feel that way right now as you are reading this article. And sadly for some, they have turned their backs on God never to trust Him again because they feel they have been let down by God too many times to count. They have concluded this God everyone talks about is no longer real.

That pretty sums up the human mindset doesn’t it? When it comes to God we instinctively expect Him or some have the nerve to even demand that whatever God does for one person, He must do for everyone else. In other words, we want and expect God to be fair. For if He is not (by our definition of fairness), we assume He is unrighteous; showing favor to some while not extending that same favor to everyone else.

This brings me to the reason for this article, how God saves sinners. Yes, this is an area I covered many times before, but I am compelled to cover it again. Reminders are good when they serve a worthwhile purpose.

In Romans 9:10-21 we read, “And not only this, but when Rebecca also had conceived by one man. Even our father Isaac (for the children not yet being born, nor having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works but of Him who calls), it was said to her, ‘The older shall serve the younger.’” As it written, “Jacob I have loved but Esau I have hated.”

What shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness with God? Certainly not! For He says to Moses, “I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I will have compassion.” So then it is not of him who wills, nor of him who runs, but God who shows mercy. For the scripture says to the Pharaoh, “For this very purpose I have raised you up, that I may show My power in you, and that My name may be declared in all the earth.” Therefore, He has mercy on whom He wills, and whom He wills He hardens.

You will say to me then. “Why does He still find fault? For who has resisted His will? But indeed O man who are you to reply against God? Will the thing formed say to Him who formed it, “Why have you made me like this?” Does not the potter have power over the clay, from same lump to make one vessel for honor an another for dishonor (or common use)?

What shall we say then? The Gentiles, who did not pursue righteousness, have attained righteousness, even the righteousness of faith; but Israel, pursuing the law of righteousness, has not attained to the law of righteousness. Why? Because they did not seek it by faith, but as it were, by the works of the law (Rom 9:30-32).

Now, let’s review. The reason why Paul presents the question, “Is there unrighteousness with God?” “Certainly not” because he knew his readers would ask that question regarding election. Paul presents the question before his opponents ask it.
Divine or sovereign election is a difficult doctrine for us as humans to accept. That is why it is not often taught in many evangelical churches; it is taboo, and it yet again, it brings God’s fairness into question.
A perfection illustration is used by Paul regarding divine election, Jacob and Esau. God tells their mother Rebecca that two nations were in her womb, and that the older would serve the younger (Gen 25:23).

The nation of Israel descended from Jacob, and the Edomites descended from Esau. God chose Jacob over Esau. Why? Because God sovereignly chose to do so; He extended mercy and compassion to Jacob while not extending those same virtues to Esau. Was Jacob more attractive, more spiritual or stronger, or had more money than Esau? No. They were twins, born at the same time. Other than a difference in hair color on the body and occupation, they were the same.  

As the text tells us, God made the decision to choose Jacob over Esau before they were born – in their mother’s womb. This was divine election at work. Was it unfair of God to choose one son over the other? In many person’s eyes YES it was unfair. Many would question God’s righteousness protesting, “What Jacob received from the Lord Esau should get it to!"

That is not how the Lord operates. God will not be governed by corrupt human politics. We must not put God on trial in a human court, and levy charges of unrighteousness, and unfairness from our lips against Him.

As we just read in verse 20, “But indeed O man who are you to reply against God?” Will the thing formed say to Him who formed it, “Why have you made me like this?”

We as the clay or pot do not have the right to complain against our maker, the Potter; foolish!!
Since God is autonomous and can do whatever He wants to do with man, He can predestine who He wants for salvation. What predestine means is that God decided before the foundation of the world to save  sinners. Who He chose is I believe a forever mystery. Why He chose some is not a mystery. God chose to save some because of His glorious grace, and that it gave Him pleasure to do so (Eph 1:5-6).

Please remember those whom God chose do not deserve it; otherwise it would not be grace, it would be a debt God owed to man. And, what about those not chosen like Esau (we do not know who they are, that is why we preach the gospel to all men)? Did God predestine them for damnation? Some scholars of old believe that – I do not. What the Bible makes clear is all have sinned and have fallen short of the glory of God (Rom 3:23). We all were destined for destruction until the love of Jesus came and we believed the gospel and were saved.

There have been those who teach that Paul is not talking about divine election unto salvation in these passages regarding Jacob and Esau, but only choosing for service. I disagree. Would Paul anticipate the opponent’s objection of God’s righteousness if only service was in view? No. Paul knew there would be resistance to the doctrine of election, and that is why He said there is no unrighteousness with God because divine election is the subject He is writing to the Roman Christians about.

There is no unrighteousness with God, ever. Just because we do not always understand God’s ways, does not mean He is unrighteous. We are the ones who are unrighteous by nature. And because of our unrighteousness, God the Father in eternity past decided He would send His only begotten Son to die a sinner’s death and redeem mankind by the shedding of His innocent blood. Those who would believe would be saved. Those who refuse to believe would be damned which is indeed righteous and just.

By God not choosing all, He is not being unjust. God is being fair and just. It is always just and fair to punish evil doers which all of us are. None of us are innocent in God’s sight apart from Christ. We have no right to demand that God saves us or provide any other blessing.  Rather, all men should plead with God to have mercy on them and forgive their sins. That takes humility and admitting your wickedness which sinful men are unwilling to do.

The only thing left for God to do is punish man when he rejects the gospel truth.  Why? Because Jesus is the only way, truth, and life to salvation (John 14:6).

Here is the fate of all men: “Whoever believes in Him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe is condemned already (italics mine), because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God” (John 3:18).

Jesus provides tremendous insight here in one verse. The entire world was already condemned and guilty before Jesus came in His incarnation. Romans 1 tell us that we all know God exists by what He has made and also by conscience – that inward faculty makes it clear to us that God is real. So therefore, we are without excuse. But, since man is evil, he suppresses the truth in unrighteousness validating His condemnation (Rom 1:18-32). When Jesus arrived on the scene who is the true light that lights every man (italics mine) that comes into the world, man is even more culpable for the revelation he receives. To reject The Light that is Jesus Christ is to heighten one’s just condemnation. To believe in The Light is to have your just condemnation removed, be justified and to be translated in the kingdom of the Lord (Col 1:13).



Tuesday, July 12, 2016

Jesus the Most Unique Man in History

The reason why I need to write about this is because it is important that I point out some extraordinary features of what happened at Christ’s crucifixion and prove why He is unique.
First, the prophecies predicting His death.
1.       Isaiah 53:12c declares that the Lord was numbered with the transgressors; meaning He was crucified between two thieves (Luke 23:34). Also in the same verse in Isaiah it says Jesus interceded (or prayed) for the transgressors. Jesus did exactly this when He was dying in agony on the cross and said, “Father forgive them for they know not what they are doing” (Luke 23:34).

2.       David some 1000 years before the birth of Christ prophesied that our Lord hands and feet would be pierced (Psalm 22:16). This prophecy was fulfilled in the gospel records (Matt 27:56; Mark 15:24; Luke 23:33-49; John 19:18).

3.       In Zechariah 12:10 the prophet said speaking of Christ said, “They will look on me whom they pierced.” This prediction was approximately 500 years before Christ’s birth. The fulfillment of this prophecy occurred when the soldier pierced Jesus side after His death (John 19:34).

4.       In John 10:17-18 Jesus said, “Therefore My Father loves Me because I lay down My life that I may take it up again. No one takes my life from Me (emphasis added), but I lay it down Myself. I have the power to lay it down, and take it up again.”

The phrase “No one takes my life from me” may seem strange in light of the fact the Romans soldiers did kill Jesus. Jesus also Himself said several times that He would be killed (Matt 16:22;17:23;20:18-19;Mark 8:31;Luke 9:22).

So, how do we reconcile the two truths and keep them in their proper tension – Jesus being killed by His enemies, and He giving up His life?

The Romans regarded Jesus no different than any other criminal they executed. As far as the religious leaders were concerned He was a heretic, a bastard (John 8:41)[i], demon possessed (vs 48, 52), and disloyal to Caesar (John 19:15).

Herein lies the difference between the two realities: The religious leaders who lied and conspired to condemn Jesus to death did it purely out of hate, envy and jealousy. God used their wickedness to providentially fulfill His plan of making His Son sin who knew no sin so that we could become the righteousness of God in Him {(Christ), (2 Cor 5:21)}.

In other words, what man meant for hateful evil intentions, God meant and accomplished for love and for our good (Gen 50:20) – the salvation of all that would believe in what Jesus accomplished on the cross for our justification.

Just because Jesus’ death was predetermined by God does not mean those that took Jesus’ life were not culpable. They were completely responsible for the Savior’s death. Listen to the words of the apostle Peter in Acts 2:23-24, “Him, being delivered by the determined purpose and foreknowledge of God, you have taken by lawless hands, crucified, and put to death, whom God raised up, having loosed the pains of death, because it was not possible that He should be held by it.”

This is why Jesus declared that “No man takes my life from Me” because He gave up His life so that we may live. Remember Jesus’ last words before He died, “Father into thy hands I commit My Spirit” (Luke 23:46).
              
                    Jesus was in total control of everything – even how He was to die! What power!

The salvation of one of the criminals crucified with Jesus – When the criminal recognized that Jesus was innocent and that He was the promised Messiah declared, “Lord remember me when You come into your kingdom”. Jesus said to him, “today you will be with me in paradise” (Luke 23:42-43). The criminal believed in Jesus and petitioned that he could be with Him in His kingdom. Herein lies a great insight. The criminal who was justly being put to death for his crimes was being loved by God the Father at the same time. God gave him saving faith to trust Jesus for his salvation. Another great insight is this hardened criminal is the only person among the crowd that believed that Jesus would rise from the dead. How do I know this? By declaring he wanted to be in the Lord’s kingdom. It would have made no sense for the criminal to make that request if Jesus was never going to raise from the dead. Dead men have no kingdoms. The criminal’s cry for mercy was heeded by Jesus. Although this man was being justly punished for his earthly crimes, he did not want to be eternally damned and separated from the Lord forever.

The Roman soldier’s confession of faith – Once Jesus died the centurion and those with him saw the things that happened when he died feared greatly, saying, “Truly this was the Son of God” (Matt 27:54). What happened to these ruthless, blood thirsty murderers for hire? Why the change of heart? The signs that accompanied Jesus’ death, the earthquake, the darkness obviously penetrated their hearts to the degree that they became genuinely remorseful for what they had done. Jesus’ prayer to the Father saying, “Forgive them for they know not what they are doing was heard and answered. Jesus’ love for His enemies is transcendent. The very ones who executed Him are the same ones He came to die for – taking their place as an offering for their sins. Though it is not explicit in the centurions’ exact words, it is clear he and the men under his charge knew they were in the presence of God. No doubt they crucified many criminals, yet none of the things they experienced at Jesus’ death ever happened to them before.

The change in the weather – For the space of three hours, supernatural darkness covered the area; from the sixth hour to the ninth hour – 12-3 pm (Matt 27:45).

The veil in the temple was torn in two – Why is this significant? Why did Matthew bother mentioning the veil in the temple? Because the veil in the temple was the curtain between the holy place and the most holy place or the holy of holies. Remember in the OT the only person allowed into the holy of holies was the High Priest. He could enter only once a year on the Day of Atonement (Yom Kippur) for the purpose of putting blood on the mercy seat to atone for his sins, and the sins of the entire nation of Israel (Read Lev 16). The mercy seat was the lid that covered the ark which contained the tablets which the 10 commandments were written. The holy of holies also is where the presence of God dwelt. Now that the veil has been torn, it signified the ending of the Old Covenant, and the ushering in of the New Covenant which was ratified in Christ’s blood and was the means by which our sins are remitted forever (Matt 26:28).

The tearing of the veil also means that all believers are now priests and have access to enter the heavenly holies anytime we want to. We no longer need an intermediary to commune with God.

All of the (8) evidences mentioned clearly makes Jesus the most unique man in history. Plenty people have been crucified and are being crucified as we speak. None of the phenomenon mentioned regarding Jesus ever happened with anyone else. It never happened before Him, and will never happen after Him.




[i] The religious leaders had to be eluding to the fact that Mary’s husband Joseph was not Jesus’ real father. So when Mary became pregnant as a result of the Holy Spirit, it was assumed by all she had an adulterous affair resulting in Jesus being born out of wedlock. According to Mosaic law, Mary and the father would have been put to death if the allegations were true.

Sunday, July 3, 2016

Retro Articles From July 2005

                                     Have the Fallen Angels become Demons?

This subject matter isn’t for the casual bible reader nor for the faint of heart. The subject the author is engaging into would be considered mccabe and spooky. Some may regard it as a study in demonology and Angels. Though I will touch on both, that’s not my intent at all. What I will attempt to do is distinguish the differences between fallen angels and demons.

So back to the original question, have the fallen angels become demons? No one knows for sure.   Let’s travel back in time.
                                          
                                 The Angels That Kept Not Their First Estate

In Genesis 6 we read where Angels are cohabiting with women and having children.[i] The scriptures read like this, “Now it came to pass when men began to multiply on the face of the earth and daughters were born to them, that the Sons of God (i.e. Angels) saw the daughters of men that they were beautiful and they took wives for themselves all of whom they chose” (Genesis 6:1,2). Important for the reader to understand. The phrase “Sons of God” is a reference to Angels. This same phrase occurs in Job 1 & 2 and Chapter 38. 

These series of events displeased the Lord. Why? Because spirits were not to cohabitate with flesh. This was during a time called the Antediluvian Period—the time before the flood. The angels that committed these acts of sin were fallen angels, not the holy elect angels of the Lord. By committing this act of sin the angels left their first estate— meaning they abandoned the use for which they were created which was to glorify and serve their creator, the Lord. As a result, they were the cast into Tartarus, a Greek term meaning the lowest Hell. This Hell was a place of darkness, and bondage to which these angels were consigned for their sin (2 Peter 2:4; Jude 6). Some believe these fallen angels became demons and inhabited men, and thus cohabited with the daughters of men and produced offspring. While this view has merit, It’s not supported by scripture. There is no reference in scripture to fallen angels ever transforming into demons. There is also no reference in scripture that angels can inhabit, or possess a human body—demons have that ability when allowed to do so. Remember this about angels, they can and do often look just like men, and prior to the flood, they had the ability to procreate. After the flood there is no account of an angel procreating for Jesus said regarding men in the resurrection, “ They neither marry nor are they given in marriage but are like the angels in heaven (Matthew 22:30).
                        
                                         

                                               The Fallen Angels In The Heavenlies

Not all of the fallen angels are consigned to Hell. There are myriads that are loose and creating havoc in the spirit realm. Here are their ranks as described in Ephesians 6:12:
Principalities, Powers, Rulers of the darkness of this world. Spiritual wickedness in high or heavenly places.

This classification of angels make up the unholy army of Satan. They’re dispatched to do his bidding. The Bible tells us that we actually wrestle against these wicked forces, that’s why we’re commanded to put on the whole armor of God that we can stand against the wiles, trick or schemes of the devil (Ephesians 6:11,12). We have to combat these angels, our enemies in the Spirit. Here’s an example.
In the book of Daniel the prophet receives a vision of an angel responding to his petition while he had been fasting for three weeks. The text reads, “From the first day you set your heart to understand, and to humble yourself before God your words were heard, and I have come because of your words, but the Prince of Persia withstood me twenty-one days; and behold Michael, one of the chief princes came to help me for I had been left alone there with the kings of Persia (Daniel 10: 12,13).

The reference to the Prince of Persia isn’t a human prince, but a Principality, a supreme ruler in the unseen heavenly realm—an unholy angel, perhaps a demon. What the angel was conveying to Daniel was that he was coming to give revelation as a result of Daniel’s prayer to the Lord, but he was in conflict with this Prince of Persia who was preventing Daniel’s answer to prayer so he had to have Michael, another angel come help him to get him through the defense of the enemy in the heavenly places. This is what we call Spiritual Warfare or fighting the good fight of faith. We through our prayers wrestle with unholy angels and elect angels are also battling these evil spirits in a dimension we can’t see with the naked eye.

In this account we see the Prince of Persia had a seat in the region of the world that is Persia (now Iran) which was the ruling nation of the world at that time, and the devil had put one of his emissaries to brood over it and to influence it in a wicked fashion. So we see how some of these evil spirits operate. Some have ruler ship over entire nations. Interesting to note that the angel that delivered the answers to Daniel stated he had to return to fight with the prince of Persia, and after him the Prince of Grecia would come (The Prince of Grecia would be the ruler over Greece) (Daniel 10:20).
                                  
                                                                                                
                                                 Satan Entered Into Judas Iscariot

What I will be attempt to explain here is how the devil entered into Judas. One thing that must be clarified here, Satan did not possess Judas called Iscariot for Satan isn’t a demon—he’s an angel, a fallen angel. Notice in scripture that demons possessed a human to the point where the human is no longer in control of his/her faculties. The demon(s) literally perform their evil deeds through the person even to the point of speaking through the person or often causing them to convulse violently. That wasn’t the case with Judas. He was in control of his thoughts and actions when he chose to betray Jesus. Satan entered in or influenced Judas to complete his infamous act of betrayal because it was already in the heart of Judas to betray the Lord. The devil didn’t force Judas to commit the sin. Judas had the choice not to betray the Lord. As the scriptures declare, “But every person is tempted when he’s drawn away by his own lust and enticed” (James 1:14). Judas was the treasurer for the group and was stealing out of the bag (John 12:6). Judas was simply a prophet for hire. When he realized he couldn’t paid for following the Lord, he sold him out for thirty pieces of silver (around $240 in Israeli currency today[1] - Matt 26:15).

Selling someone for thirty pieces of silver was the price for a slave. That is how Judas thought about Jesus.

Judas is given one of the most contemptible names in all of scripture. He’s called the Son of Perdition (John 17:12). That title was given to only one other person…The Antichrist (II Thess 2:4)—the man the devil will embody during the last days. So one can see the heinous act of betrayal Judas committed. Judas was literally a tool of the devil to commit this act of sin for the devil was his father (John 8:44). Jesus said it best, “ It would have been better if  that man (Judas) had never been born” (Matt 26:24; Mark 14:21; Luke 22:22). Think about for a second, Judas betrayed the almighty God for less than $250!  The thrill didn’t last long for Judas. Once the novelty wore off and he realized the enormity of sin, he became remorseful and threw the money away. The devil succeeded in destroying Judas which is his “MO” (John 10). Judas committed suicide because the devil successfully used him and subsequently led him to kill himself (Matthew 27:5).
             
                                                  Where Do Demons Come From?

How long demons have been around it’s hard to tell. Many believe the fallen angels became demons in the rebellion before the dawn of time so the terms fallen angels and
demons are used interchangeably. While it’s possible this may have occurred, my reply is no.
The Hebrew term for demon is *śēd . The Greek terms is dáimōn & diabolos. The terms simply means evil spirits.

Demons are also called devils in scripture (depends upon the translation). They’re evil spirits that belong to the kingdom of Satan. These creatures are worshiped as deity by all false religions. In the Old Testament we hear the term familiar spirits to refer to demons—meaning witches or wizards would consult with the familiar spirit at the request of someone desiring to consult with the dead. The sophisticated term for communicating with the dead is necromancy. The mediator between the requestor and the dead is called a Medium. Today we call them physics who conduct seances or use tarot cards to divine the future Most physics are nothing more than hucksters and charlatans who crave on the foolish and gullible to hustle them out of their money. They have no real power. The medium isn’t talking to a dead loved one, but a demon impersonating them. The consulting of Mediums is forbidden in scripture and was punishable by death. (Leviticus 19:31; I Samuel 28).

Unfortunately, television and motion pictures make these real horrors romantic and entertaining and that's just exactly what the enemy wants us to believe—to believe in the make believe of these creatures and not the real activity of demons. If you can reduce demons to that of a mere “boogeyman” , then you can successfully dupe the masses into being subconsciously desensitized to the real threat of these disembodied spirits looking for a home (that is your body). Much of the diseases, starvation, and possession of human beings can be attributed to these wicked parasites.

By the time Jesus was on the earth, demons had infiltrated the earth and had possessed perhaps millions of people. Keep in mind the glory of the Lord was in Israel during the era before Christ and therefore not once did you hear of anyone being “demon possessed”. Their power wasn’t in full force because of the glory of God’s presence. Demons can’t endure the light of the Lord. Once the Old Testament ended with the Prophet Malachi, the Lord was silent—meaning he didn’t speak through any prophet for four hundred years until the John the Baptist in the New Testament, the time of Jesus Christ. During that parenthesis in history-i.e. the four hundred years, demons probably proliferated the earth like locusts. Jesus of course had the power to cast them out. The demons were terrified of Jesus and knew who he was (Mark 5).

In summary, the best way to combat demons is not give place to the devil, and the way to do that is to be saved by repenting of your sins, and receiving the Lord Jesus Christ. Only then will you have power over them. Worshiping or consulting with them is an invitation to destruction of your soul.



[1] The Hebrews’ currency is the silver shequel. The exchange rate is about ¼ of the US dollar.



[i] There is another view that the Sons of God in this passage does not make reference to angels but to the Sons of Seth. Some believe God was displeased that Seth’s descendants the godly line cohabiting with the daughters of men who were of the ungodly line of Cain. I do not lean to this view. From the text of Genesis 6, it seems to better support that the Sons of God are angels having inordinate sexual relationships with women. No one knows for sure.

Monday, June 13, 2016

The Tattooed Christian

There are different views on the matter of Christians sporting tattoos. Does the Bible permit or forbid it? Is it a violation of our bodies which God said are temples of the Holy Spirit (1 Cor 6:19)? Is it a compromise, too worldly, carnal or outright disobedience? Or, is it just body art, trendy, a form of expression, an addiction, or a form of self -mutilation?

In Leviticus 19:28 it says, “You shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor tattoo any marks on you. I am the Lord”.

In antiquity, cuttings and markings on one’s body was connected to ancient pagan religious practices. These activities were supposed to appease their gods and were a part of their worship. The children of Israel were prohibited from practicing the evil cultic practices of the nations surrounding them.
We read in 1 Corinthians 10:23 we read, “All things are lawful for me, but not all things are helpful; all things are lawful for me, but not all things edify”.

So, regarding Leviticus 19:28 does the text apply to the Church, or just to Israel? I would have to say the latter. There are no NT verses that prohibit Christians from wearing tattoos. With that said, is it always the best choice? That depends upon your social status and environment. If you work in a place where your appearance must be professional, and you have tattoos on your neck, arms and face, that will present a problem. Let’s be honest, how would we feel if President Obama was rocking Dreds like Bob Marley and had tattoos like Wiz Khalifa? Not a good look for the leader of the free world. It would be an obvious distraction. Many would ignore what he was saying verses how he looked. We all would be talking about him, negatively.

Why? Because of the position he holds; he’s a dignitary. He would be criticized if he appeared at the UN like that. Lets face it, in his arena appearance means a lot.

On the other hand, if you work for Amoeba, a vintage record store on Sunset Blvd where tattoos and piercings seem to be a pre-requisite, then you are good to go. Also some NBA players sport the body art a lot now.

The matter of tattoos is a matter of preference and I believe self-expression. A lot of tattoos have personal messages regarding loved ones that have passed away, a favorite scripture, a particular quote or a favorite team. I see no harm in those.

As a believer you never want to permanently put something on you that is disgraceful, misogynistic, or dishonoring to yourself or God.

As with anything however many take it to the extreme, and abuse their bodies with the ink. For many, it becomes a fetish, an addiction; the more they have, the more they want it like a drug.
We should never judge based on outward appearances. Just because someone in the church does not look the way you think they should look, does not mean they are out the will of God, or engaged in gross sin – they simply like being “tatted-up” – it’s their identification.

Also, it does not mean the person is a rebel either. Let us not major in the minors.
For the Lord does not see as man sees; for man looks at the outward appearance, but the Lord looks at the heart (I Sam 16:7).

In Romans 14:22b-23 we read, “Happy is he who does not condemn himself in what he approves, but he who doubts is condemned if he eats (well in this case having a tattoo) because he does not eat from faith. For whatever is not from faith is sin”.

In I Corinthians 10:31-33 we read, “Therefore, whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God. Give no offense either to the Jews or the Greeks (Greeks would be indicative of all non-Jewish people in this text), or to the Church of God, just as I also please all men in all things not seeking my own profit, but for the profit of many that they may be saved.”

In the Romans passage, we must make sure we are not doing anything just to gain acceptance with someone and later regret the decision we made. In other words, whatever we do provided it is not sinful, we must do with a clear conscience so that we do not condemn ourselves; for if we do, we have sinned. Bringing it to the subject at hand, if someone gets a tattoo because someone dared them to, or the person said you would look good with a certain marking on your body and you proceed to do it, but later regret the decision, you have sinned. Why? Because you did it in guilt and not in confidence or faith. Please remember I’m talking about believers only.

If you are going to engage in a neutral activity, be sure you can handle what you are doing so that you are not later smitten by your conscience.

Now looking at the 1 Corinthians 10 passages, Paul is focusing more on ministry – mainly on saving souls. The more mature believer would operate in this vein ( I admit I’m far from this level). Paul is saying he does not want to do anything that would hinder the gospel and the salvation of souls. So if there is anything in our lives that would supercede the advancement of God’s kingdom even though we have every right to do it, we should refrain from it for the Kingdom of God’s sake. I understand, none of us arrive at this maturity level overnight, and naturally none of us like to be told or even suggested to us what we should and should not do even for the Church of God’s sake.

You can view this article as a two-sided coin. On heads, we see that having a tattoo in it of itself is not sinful; it is strictly a matter of preference, style, expression, and to many perhaps self-worth. It is no different than a belly, tongue or nose piercing. For others, their expression is hair color, hair extensions, Dreadlocks, Mohawk or French braid hairstyles. For other it is makeup, jewelry, clothing and shoes.

On tails, we have to focus on our freedom in Christ vs what is best for the Kingdom of God. Unfortunately, for some people – usually young believers in the faith something as trivial as a tattoo on someone may determine if they will worship at a particular church or not because they are offended. In that person’s mind the tattoo is a symbol of rebellion and ungodliness; perhaps all they see is biker gangs or hate groups wearing tattoos. If tattoos are evil, then it would also be sinful to shave one’s head or trim their beard (Lev 19:27). Also, pork, lobster, crab, shrimp would be forbidden to eat (Lev 11).

This is where I believe it is important to take the mature approach and explain to the offended person that a tattoo does not determine someone’s eternal destiny. The disposition of a person’s standing before God which is a matter of the heart is what determines that destiny.

The overarching virtue we must exhibit is love toward our weaker brother and sister. We who know our freedoms in Christ must not allow our liberties to become a stumbling block to those who do not understand those freedoms yet and speak evil about them (Rom 14:16; 1 Cor 10:30). There are some things (gray areas perhaps: drinking, tattoos, certain movies) perhaps we can refrain from doing to edify our young siblings in the faith, and also it is important that our brethren continue to grow in the grace and knowledge of Jesus Christ so that they understand their freedoms too (2 Peter 3:18).


Sunday, May 29, 2016

Is God dispensing new revelation today?

                                           
There are many that say God has given them a “fresh word” for today. Or that “the word of the Lord came until them saying”….

Point being is many believe God is talking to them just like He spoke to the prophets of old.
Is this true? Is God speaking to us just like He spoke to them? Many say, “Of course He is! Why wouldn’t He?” While others are saying “He is not”, while others are perhaps not so sure.

The reason why I believe it is important we discuss this is because if God is giving prophetic words like He gave in the Old and New Testaments, then we would have to conclude that God is providing new revelation in the 21st century.

While I am not going to argue if God spoke to someone (either in their own spirit they believe or audibly)  privately for their own benefit and direction; for only the individuals know whether they heard from the Lord or not. What I will challenge is the idea that God is giving a predictive prophetic word for us today.

God does everything for a reason. And with the nation of Israel, it was revealed to them clearly what He thought.

Deuteronomy 18:15,18 “The Lord your God will raise up for you a Prophet like me from your midst from your brethren. Him you will hear…I will raise up for them a Prophet like you from among their brethren, and will put my words in their mouth, and He shall speak to them all that I command Him.”
This prophecy was in reference to the Messiah that would come to the world 1400 years later according to the time of Moses’ prophecy. Peter recalls this prophecy in Acts 3:22.

Isaiah 9:6-7 – For unto us a Child is born, unto us a Son is given; and the government will be upon His shoulder. And His name will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of peace. Of the increase of His government and peace there will be no end (Daniel 2:44). Upon the throne  of David and over His kingdom, to order it and establish it with judgment and justice. From that time forward, even forever. The zeal of the Lord of hosts will perform this.

Jeremiah 25:11 – Talking about Judah’s impending capture and deportation by Nebuchadnezzar and the Babylonians, “And this whole land will be a desolation and an astonishment and those nations shall serve the King of Babylon seventy years.

This literally happened. Starting in 605 B.C. the Babylonians began the first of three sieges on Jerusalem. The second happened in 597 B.C., and the third and final invasion occurred in 586 B.C. when Nebuchadnezzar burned the city to the ground (Read Jeremiah chapter 52 and 2 Chronicles 36:19).

The seventy years began in the year 605 B.C. The first Israelite refugees returned to Jerusalem under the degree of King Cyrus to build the house of God in 536 B.C. (2 Chronicles 36:23; Ezra 1:1-3).

Daniel 9:26 – The angel Gabriel tells Daniel that Jesus would be killed about 500 years before it actually happens. As a matter of fact, we know the date. According to history, when the decree was made for the Hebrews to rebuild their holy city Jerusalem until the Messiah the Prince was April 9th 32 A.D. This occurred on Palm Sunday when Jesus rode on a donkey (Zechariah 9:9).
Of course we know five days later Jesus was crucified.

Matthew 23:37-39 – O Jerusalem Jerusalem, the one who kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to her! How often I wanted to gather your children together as hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you were not willing! See! Your house is left to you desolate; for I say to you shall see Me no more till you say, “Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord!”
The similar passages occur in Matthew 24:2, Mark 13:2 and Luke 19:41-44.

Jesus predicted the destruction of the nation Israel by the Roman Emperor Titus. The epic fatal event took place in 70 A.D. when four Roman legions broke through the walls and burned the city to the ground. 1.1 million Hebrews were killed; many were crucified, while other were taken away prisoner to Rome as slaves to be paraded in the streets in defeat, and to help rebuild the city since Rome had suffered three-fourths damage to their city due to civil war.

The point I want to try to drive home with these prophecies are they all had specificity. All of the prophecies mentioned have come to pass in part, or in full. For instance, the Isaiah 9:6-7 prophecy has been partially fulfilled. The part where unto us a child is born, unto to us a Son is given was fulfilled in Christ’s first coming. The part about Him receiving the throne of His father David has yet to be fulfilled – it will occur at His second coming in the future at the end of time and into eternity.

You will not hear a prophecy from anyone today with the preciseness of the ones mentioned above. Because there is not a need for it anymore. Scripture tells us that the Lord will not do anything unless He reveals his secret to His servants the prophets (Amos 3:7).

Any prophesying that anyone can do today is solely based on known recorded revelation, not new revelation. Our prophecies are no longer foretelling which has the predictive element in it – in others words we do not need a prophecy today that will predict the future; rather our prophecies are forth telling – meaning we are exegeting the text of scripture.

I am convinced since the canon (i.e. the whole of scripture) is complete, and we have received revelation all the way to the end of time into eternity, there is nothing else for the Lord to reveal. Why would God began to now deliver to us a brand new word after nearly two thousand years? Yet, there are numerous modern day “prophets and prophetesses” who insist God has a fresh prophetic word for us today as individuals, local church congregations and as a nation.  Also, if these individuals are convinced the words they are speaking are from God, why aren’t they being recorded as Holy Scripture as the OT and NT writers’ words were? Did they really hear from God?
I am admittedly skeptical.

So, when or if someone approaches you and declares that, “The Lord told me to tell you thus and so”, be very careful. They may mean well, but they are also on a slippery slope. We are commanded not to believe every spirit, but rather test (emphasis added) those spirits whether they are from God. Why? For being many false prophets have gone into the world (I John 4:1). The scripture also commands us to test all things (italics mine). Hold fast to that which Is good (1 Thessalonians 5:21). You know what that means? It means we are to judge (yes I know, we hate the J-word) what someone says against the word of God. If what they say does not comes to pass, they are a false prophet and cannot be trusted (Deuteronomy 18:20-22). They also have proven that the “prophecy” they gave to you did not come from the Lord – they are deluded and should keep quiet. Every word the prophets of old spoke came to pass precisely as they declared it proving they were authentic servants who truly heard from the Lord.




Saturday, May 28, 2016

Why is Jesus called the only Begotten Son of God?

There are many that make the mistake of thinking when the Bible declares that Jesus is God’s only Begotten Son that it must refer to the Father God having a conjugal relationship resulting in Jesus being born.

That reasoning is a gross error.
There are also many that believe since the Bible says that Jesus is the firstborn among many brethren that He had a beginning and therefore He is not eternal.

This is also an unfortunate conclusion.
Since both views are wrong, how do we define begotten and firstborn?
The Greek word is prōtotokos. This is a compound word. Proto means first. The second Greek word is tikto which means to beget.

Naturally It refers to Jesus being born of the virgin Mary (Luke 2:7). Jesus was the firstborn among his half brothers and sisters (Matthew 12:46-48;13:55).
In the Hebrew culture the firstborn male in the family was privileged. He would inherit a double portion of his father’s estate because he is the beginning of his father’s strength (Deuteronomy 21:15-17).

Metaphorically, Jesus being the Firstborn among those who believe in Him, created a new born again race of people that were begotten through Him and adopted as sons and daughters by God the Father when they believed (Rom 8:15; 9:26; Eph 1:5;Gal 3:26).

Jesus being the only Begotten of God means He is preeminent in rank above all creation. He is also the creator of all things and holds the creation together.

Colossians 1:15-18 says, “He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. For by Him all things were created that are in heaven and that are on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers. All things were created through Him and for Him. And He is before all things, and in Him all things consist. And He is the head of the body, the church, who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, that in all things, He may have the preeminence.”
The writer Paul could not have it explained the matter any clearer. Jesus is NUMERO UNO in everything!

He is infinite and from everlasting the prophet Micah says (Micah 5:2).
The word image in Colossians 1:15 in the Greek is the word eikōn. The English equivalent is our word Icon.

This denotes that Christ is of the same essence as the Father. The only difference is that Jesus is visible and the Father God is invisible. Did not Jesus tell Phillip that he that has seen me has seen the Father (John 14:9)? Simply put, Jesus is the visible manifestation of His Father.
This has to mean that Jesus is God manifested in the flesh.


Concluding, Jesus being the only Begotten Son of God makes reference to Him being first and preeminent in all things since He is the firstborn from the dead (Colossians 1:18). And through Him, the church was conceived and born. Jesus is the only person to exist before He was born into this world. How? Because He is preexistent and does not have a beginning other than His human beginning through His mother.  He is indeed the author of the beginning because He created all things. Without Him nothing can exist that does exist (John 1:3).

Jesus being Begotten makes reference to His relationship to the Father and His position and rank with Him. Jesus always existed and is immortal and eternal.

Jesus declares of Himself that, “I am the Alpha and the Omega, the Beginning and the End” (Revelation 1:8;22:13).

For those of you reading this that still do not believe, I pray that God opens your eyes today so that you will believe. It Is not enough to just believe in Jesus – demons do that (James 2:19). But rather, “what do you believe about Him?”

You MUST believe that He is God the Son.


Revelation 20 - Part 1

This chapter is the only place where the devil is bound (vs 2). Notice an angel from heaven does it, not us. Humans have never been able to ...